PRIVATE WEALTH - February/March 2008 Issue
Migration, Interrupted - By
Hannah Shaw Grove - 02/1/2008
Hannah Shaw Grove
Ms. Grove is a respected author, columnist and speaker and a leading
authority on the mindset, behavior, concerns, preferences and finances
of high-net-worth individuals. She is the executive editor of Private Wealth, the first and only magazine for professionals with ultra-affluent clients, and Cultivating the Affluent, a practice management newsletter for financial professionals.
View all articles by Hannah Shaw Grove
Wealth
management swept the advisory industry about five years ago like
Hurricane Olga swept through the unsuspecting Caribbean in
mid-December. It was the hottest buzzword, cropping up in everything
from casual conversations to business plans, and almost every financial
services firm changed their name or their promotional materials in some
way to incorporate the term. In fact, most of the major independent,
regional and wirehouse firms feature it prominently on their Web sites,
as do their more successful practitioners. Less true with private
banks, although, arguably, it is their business model, service offering
and deep client relationships that many firms consider the benchmark.
But
it takes more than a name change to effect change, and despite the
prolific use of the phrase reality is somewhat different. In a recent
study we conducted with more than 6,100 professional advisors we
discovered that just 28.3% of practitioners actually operate as wealth
managers. The good news is that it’s the second most used business
model in the industry (after generalist, the model of nearly half of
all advisors) but still far less pervasive than marketplace positioning
would have you believe.
The intention made perfect sense—given
the increase in personal wealth and its complexities—and still does.
But the transition hasn’t happened. Why? Our work with advisors reveals
that the three biggest factors behind a failed attempt at wealth
management are (1) insufficient knowledge of the client to deliver on a
broader mandate, (2) limited experience with the sophisticated
strategies that round out the product and service platform, and (3)
poor-to-disastrous implementation results.
In short, many
advisors are trying to adopt a new business model prematurely and
without the needed preparation—actions that are capable of causing
irreparable damage to key client relationships. All of this can, of
course, be remedied with focus, information, practice and a willingness
to collaborate with experts and specialists that can augment the core
capabilities of the transitioning advisor. Straightforward but
time-consuming efforts that may pave the way for many more advisors to
finally, successfully make the transition...

